🔗 Share this article

Iran is willing to restart nuclear negotiations with the United States on condition that it is handled with "dignity" and "respect", Tehran's foreign minister has stated.

Abbas Araghchi declared exclusively dialogue was effective, and shared fresh requests had come from go-betweens to restart talks with the American leadership. He claimed Iran did not have undeclared nuclear sites, and Iran was not yet able to permit the global atomic watchdog to visit bombed nuclear sites for safety concerns.

Navigating a Difficult Route

The foreign minister is navigating a complex route since Iran does not want appear to be proceeding from a situation of disadvantage, and he consistently maintained that Iran had arisen more powerful militarily and psychologically from the Israeli-US attack on its atomic facilities in June.

He was talking at a defense forum in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to enrich uranium within its borders that it will never give up" – the main reason of the impasse in the earlier negotiations.

Earlier Negotiations Suddenly Terminated

The earlier sessions of discussions between the US and Iran were ended suddenly and bitter termination on 12 June when the Israeli government, with US support, struck Iranian nuclear sites in a fortnight-long engagement that concluded with Donald Trump claiming the sites had been eliminated. Following this, European countries employed their authority to reimpose global restrictions, but Iran asserts they have not had a significant effect.

Ideal Resolution Proposed

Iranian officials stated they felt they had reached a "perfect agreement" to the enrichment issue in prior discussions, when it was decided an Iran-based consortium with American involvement could refine atomic fuel. The two nations would have been able to claim victory since home-based processing would have continued and the US could be certain that Iran's nuclear programme was entirely non-military.

It had not been settled in the talks that US nuclear scientists could operate inside Iran, but that was a logical implication of the cooperative offer. Diplomats claimed repeatedly they had secured an understanding with Washington's diplomat Steve Witkoff only for the agreement to collapse due to "opponents in the US".

Current Status

Iranian officials declared the cooperative arrangement was now no longer available, but it seems quite possible the offer could be resurrected in some form if negotiations resume.

Trump in recent days stated he had been getting signals that Iran sought to restart talks, but confidentially Iran's diplomats say they are not yet getting coherent offers from the United States either explicitly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as Qatar, Egypt, the Omani authorities and Saudi Arabia. The Iran's state department has been criticized of inactivity in the aftermath of the US president's straightforward manner, but Iran states dialogue is not part of a show.

Political Standpoint

In his address to the conference, intended to depict the US as a controlling nation that exploits the idea of international law, Araghchi said the two-week conflict demonstrated the conflict could not be resolved by combat operations. He stated the strikes started with a American requirement for an unconditional Iranian surrender and concluded with an absolute demand for a ceasefire.

Iran is certain the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were executed with full US knowledge and coordination, making faith difficult to rebuild.

Negotiations Stays the Ultimate Solution

Araghchi declared: "It was not Iran that had deserted negotiations; it was the United States and the European states that had always attempted to impose their will during the discussions. Diplomacy can still be viable and stays the final resolution to settle conflicts, but its criteria, regulations and principles must be adhered to."

"In case they address to the nation of Iran with the language of respect and honor, they will receive a response in the identical tone."

Restoration and Reconstruction

In what is described by Iran's diplomats as the struggle of recovery and reconstruction, Araghchi said he was certain Iran's security strengths "are much stronger than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been reestablished. We acquired multiple understandings from this engagement; we have come to know our internal vulnerabilities and the vulnerabilities of the opponent."

He stated: "We successfully passed this conflict. Our atomic expertise, which they intended to obliterate, continues to exist. The installations and machinery, if destroyed, will be restored; what is important is the determination of the nation of Iran and then the national cohesion that they sought to undermine, but were unable to break. The Iranian people have developed more resilient, more cohesive, and more supportive of the leadership and the state in the face of this assault."