🔗 Share this article

Just two days before the New York mayoral election, political analyst Michael Lange issued a significant electoral prediction – going beyond who would win citywide, and block by block. The analyst, an expert in elections who grew up in the city, has spent over a decade in left-leaning activism and emerged as something of a well-known figure recently for his deep dives into municipal statistics and polling.

He released his highly detailed forecast map – accurately predicting that Zohran Mamdani would win although missing Andrew Cuomo’s solid showing – on his Substack, his platform. Lange has a flair for clever terms. He highlighted, for instance, the divide between the “commie corridor”, stretching from Park Slope to Bushwick to Astoria, where he forecasted (accurately) that the left-wing candidate would win by huge margins, and the conservative-leaning zone on affluent parts of Manhattan. There, certain media outlets and Wall Street Journal outrank the New York Times” in readership and most voters favored the independent, campaigning as a conservative-courting independent.

Voting Day Trends and Unexpected Results

What was your election night?

I had to do that since they were adding approximately 200K votes into the tally frequently! I felt a little nervous at the beginning: Mamdani led the early vote by a dozen percentage points, but there were two big batches of ballots that came in after that and the advantage dropped from 12% to 8%. I was worried.

Understand, it was possible where yesterday turned out kind of poorly for him, in which Cuomo was going to end up basically increasing his support from the Democratic primary. However Mamdani gained 500,000 votes to his initial base, and this was critical why he succeeded. He went out and greatly broadened his support from the primary.

Expanding Support

How did Mamdani gain those extra votes from?

He built the coalition that progressives long aimed for: diverse racially, youthful, it’s renters and it’s people facing cost pressures. He gained significantly with Black and Hispanic voters, everyday New Yorkers, compared to the earlier election. Plus he further maximized his core of left-leaning activists, youthful radicals, and immigrant groups. He couldn’t have won without making those significant inroads.

He built the alliance that the left long aimed for: diverse, young, renters and residents struggling with costs

There were also some Trump/Mamdani voters – is that a big trend?

It’s definitely a real thing, limited to working-class Latinos, Asian communities and Muslims. Voters in immigrant strongholds that supported the former president previously went for the progressive this year. However it’s not that he was winning over white working-class voters and Maga voters.

Voter Participation and Impact

A major development of the election was the record turnout. Who benefited?

Both sides. Turnout was significantly higher than I had expected. I figured it could exceed 2 million, but it reached 2.3M – which is a huge number of participants. Existed a substantial opposition group, energized, but his supporters was also motivated, and that sufficed to win.

You forecasted he’d get over half the ballots. Is he on course for that?

Currently you would say he’s favored to surpass 50%. He’s at 50.4% but there’s still probably 200K ballots left to report at that time. So it’s not certain, but I believe probable, and I hope he achieves it so afterwards none can claim the Republican was a spoiler.

Republican Collapse

Curtis Sliwa, the Republican candidate, is the other big story. His support plummeted.

He didn’t win any district in any borough. Including one neighborhood in the borough, which is like an highly conservative area. That really was unexpected. Cuomo kept Caucasian districts, very wealthy areas and very religiously Jewish areas, and then added many conservatives on the island who had a strong turnout. I think occurred significant tactical voting by GOP voters. This happened before Trump endorsed for Cuomo, but it assisted. It might have changed the outcome unless Mamdani’s coalition hadn’t grown.

Progressive Strongholds

What about your often-discussed “commie corridor” – did backing for Mamdani dominant in those areas of Brooklyn and Queens?

In my view existed a little dilution of the commie corridor in some areas like Astoria or Greenpoint that have older Caucasian residents. In Astoria, for example, the property owners and residents all went for the independent. Thus there existed a little resistance. But overall, largely the commie corridor is a key factor why Mamdani prevailed – he was polling between 77% and 83% in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Community Support

Prior to the vote there was coverage on whether Mamdani was gaining ground with Jewish New Yorkers. Is there any suggestion that he did?

There are areas with a lot of secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – like specific locales – where he did well. But in the affluent districts like the Manhattan area, his Middle East stance was influential in those places. Similarly in the more middle-class Jewish areas like Queens neighborhoods, or Bronx areas – they favored the independent. Plus, you have newcomers from the former Soviet Union in southern Brooklyn, who were pretty staunchly supportive. Therefore I don’t know if existed crazy narrative-busters here, but Mamdani did hold more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and even parts of the Upper West Side by big margins.

Political Impact

Did Mamdani redefine what the city represents in politics? Will progressive base serve as a springboard for progressive contenders?

Yes, it’s no coincidence that some of the biggest political leaders from the left hail from a handful of neighborhoods in the boroughs. I’m sure that we’ll see additional examples – candidates will emerge from these neighborhoods to be elevated nationally.

But I think that every city in the US could develop similar progressive hubs. Cities are the centers of progressive influence in America – because youth reside there, people rent and they represent locales where people are crushed by the disparities we face.